Call constructor with an email inside unit test.

[dlemstra]

This patch makes sure that the other constructor of Email is called during the unit test. This should be merged before pull-request #345 that will fail on this test. The setter of Name should be changed to something like the code below by @stevensona inside his pull request:

set
{
  _name = value?.Trim(Quote);
}

p.s. I don't think we need a CLA for such a minor change in your unit tests or do we?

[thinkingserious]

Hi @dlemstra,

Unfortunately, we do need the CLA. If you don't mind, please sign it for us. Hopefully, there will be other contributions you will make :)

[stevensona]

Thanks @dlemstra for pointing that out. I missed the fact that in that second form of the constructor, the default value of name is null. That does seems a little weird to me though. Why not have a default value of ""?

[dlemstra]

I found the issue because of the hacktoberfest and thought I could help out a bit. But I am not going to share my personal details for a simple change to your unit tests. Feel free to add my patch to your commits @stevensona. I am going to close this pull request.

[thinkingserious]

@dlemstra,

Understood and thanks for graciously offering up your changes to @stevensona. Thanks!