fix: add workflow input block for dataflow workflow #1134
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Armin Graf <arminhammer@gmail.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR fixes a bug in the "Use Non-object Output" test scenario by adding the missing workflow input block. The workflow definition uses {petId} for URI interpolation (line 78), which requires this input to function correctly.
Key Changes
- Added workflow input specification to the "Use Non-object Output" scenario for consistency with other test scenarios in the same file
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please specify parts of this PR update:
Discussion or Issue link:
#1108
What this PR does:
I am running into the same issue as the one described in #1108, and agree that it is a bug that should be fixed. This PR adds a workflow input clause, matching the style of other tests, for consistency.
Additional information: