Skip to content

fix: handle None test_ds in skipped messages count#232

Merged
zyksir merged 1 commit into
sgl-project:mainfrom
RuixiangMa:skipped-messages-count-fix
Sep 21, 2025
Merged

fix: handle None test_ds in skipped messages count#232
zyksir merged 1 commit into
sgl-project:mainfrom
RuixiangMa:skipped-messages-count-fix

Conversation

@RuixiangMa
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

The problem occurs when test_ds is None due to split-eval being False by default
截屏2025-09-15 11 59 23

Modifications

Explicitly handles the case when test_ds is None

Related Issues

Accuracy Test

截屏2025-09-15 13 10 14

Benchmark & Profiling

Checklist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @RuixiangMa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a runtime error that occurs when the test_ds (test dataset) variable is None, specifically when split-eval is disabled by default. It introduces a modification to the prepare_data.py script to safely calculate the total number of messages, ensuring the application continues to function correctly under these conditions and avoids crashes related to None type operations.

Highlights

  • Error Handling: Correctly calculates the total number of messages when test_ds is None to prevent a TypeError in the skipped messages count print statement.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a TypeError that occurs when test_ds is None by adding a conditional check. The fix is effective. I've added one suggestion to improve the clarity of the new variable name and the associated log message to avoid potential confusion.

Comment thread scripts/prepare_data.py
Comment on lines +194 to 197
total_messages = len(train_ds) + (len(test_ds) if test_ds is not None else 0)
print(
f"Skipped {total_skipped_count}/{len(train_ds)+len(test_ds)} messages for {dataset_name}"
f"Skipped {total_skipped_count}/{total_messages} messages for {dataset_name}"
)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this change correctly fixes the bug, the variable name total_messages is a bit misleading as it represents the total number of conversations (or dataset items), not the total number of messages within them. The resulting log message Skipped {X}/{Y} messages is ambiguous because it compares a count of skipped messages (X) to a count of conversations (Y).

To improve clarity and maintainability, I suggest renaming the variable to be more specific and updating the log message to reflect what is being counted.

Suggested change
total_messages = len(train_ds) + (len(test_ds) if test_ds is not None else 0)
print(
f"Skipped {total_skipped_count}/{len(train_ds)+len(test_ds)} messages for {dataset_name}"
f"Skipped {total_skipped_count}/{total_messages} messages for {dataset_name}"
)
total_conversations = len(train_ds) + (len(test_ds) if test_ds is not None else 0)
print(
f"Skipped {total_skipped_count} messages across {total_conversations} conversations for {dataset_name}"
)

@zyksir zyksir merged commit 07157bd into sgl-project:main Sep 21, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants