-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
fix ckpt dir check #320
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix ckpt dir check #320
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @justadogistaken, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a subtle bug in the validation of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes an issue with the checkpoint directory check. Previously, not providing a ckpt_dir would incorrectly raise an error. The new logic properly handles this by only validating the path if it's provided. While reviewing this change, I noticed a critical pre-existing bug within the modified code block where draft_model_config is assigned a string path instead of a configuration object, which would cause the program to crash. I've included a comment with a suggested fix for this issue.
| ) | ||
| if args.ckpt_dir is not None: | ||
| if os.path.isdir(args.ckpt_dir): | ||
| draft_model_config = os.path.join(args.ckpt_dir, "config.json") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There appears to be a type mismatch here. The draft_model_config variable is expected to be an AutoDraftModelConfig object, but it's being assigned a string (a file path). This will likely cause an AttributeError later when this variable is used in functions like build_target_model or build_dataloaders.
To fix this, you should load the configuration from the file path using the AutoDraftModelConfig.from_file method.
| draft_model_config = os.path.join(args.ckpt_dir, "config.json") | |
| draft_model_config = AutoDraftModelConfig.from_file(os.path.join(args.ckpt_dir, "config.json")) |
Co-authored-by: baojiangnan <baojiangnan@kuaishou.com>
Motivation
Modifications
Related Issues
Accuracy Test
Benchmark & Profiling
Checklist