Skip to content

fix(model): add --yes flag to npx ccusage command#126

Merged
AnnatarHe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/issue-125-20251005-0726
Oct 5, 2025
Merged

fix(model): add --yes flag to npx ccusage command#126
AnnatarHe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/issue-125-20251005-0726

Conversation

@AnnatarHe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add --yes flag when calling npx to run ccusage to auto-accept prompts and avoid blocking the command execution.

Fixes #125

Generated with Claude Code

Add --yes flag when calling npx to run ccusage to auto-accept prompts and avoid blocking the command execution.

Fixes #125

Co-authored-by: Le He <AnnatarHe@users.noreply.github.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @AnnatarHe, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses an issue where the npx ccusage command could block execution due to interactive prompts. By incorporating the --yes flag, the command will now run non-interactively, streamlining the data collection process and improving the robustness of the system when npx is used as a fallback.

Highlights

  • NPM Command Execution: The --yes flag has been added to the npx ccusage command execution. This change ensures that npx automatically accepts any prompts, preventing the command from blocking and requiring manual intervention.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Oct 5, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
model/ccusage_service.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 23.42% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
model/ccusage_service.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly adds the --yes flag to the npx ccusage command to prevent it from blocking on user prompts. The change is well-implemented and necessary for non-interactive execution. For consistency, you might also consider adding the --yes flag to the bunx command, as it can exhibit the same prompting behavior. This would ensure the tool runs smoothly regardless of which package runner is used.

@AnnatarHe AnnatarHe merged commit 971c6e6 into main Oct 5, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@AnnatarHe AnnatarHe deleted the claude/issue-125-20251005-0726 branch October 5, 2025 07:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix: add --yes if call ccusage with npx

1 participant