Add endpoint to get project metadata by SF id or Paratext id

[Nateowami]

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 40 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 81.74%. Comparing base (2d11aef) to head (addab40).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ture/Controllers/OnboardingRequestRpcController.cs	0.00%	40 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3697      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.83%   81.74%   -0.09%     
==========================================
  Files         619      619              
  Lines       38623    38663      +40     
  Branches     6293     6316      +23     
==========================================
  Hits        31606    31606              
- Misses       6056     6083      +27     
- Partials      961      974      +13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[RaymondLuong3]

Did you want to create tests for the controller? I see there is currently no tests for this class, and I recall that was mostly intentional

@RaymondLuong3 reviewed 2 files and all commit messages, and made 2 comments.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on Nateowami).

---

src/SIL.XForge.Scripture/Controllers/OnboardingRequestRpcController.cs line 555 at r2 (raw file):

            bool hasParatextId = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(paratextId);
            bool hasScriptureForgeId = !string.IsNullOrEmpty(scriptureForgeId);
            if (hasParatextId == hasScriptureForgeId)

You could also use the xor operator to achieve the same thing.

Code quote (i):

            if (hasParatextId == hasScriptureForgeId)

Code snippet (ii):

if (hasParatextId ^ hasScriptureForgeId)

[Nateowami]

It should probably have tests added as some point, but so far the requirements have changed rapidly enough that it hasn't seemed worth it. I think I will add them in a future PR.

@Nateowami made 2 comments and resolved 1 discussion.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on RaymondLuong3).

---

src/SIL.XForge.Scripture/Controllers/OnboardingRequestRpcController.cs line 555 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, RaymondLuong3 (Raymond Luong) wrote…

You could also use the xor operator to achieve the same thing.

I think XOR would have != semantics. Also, I think == better expresses intent.

[RaymondLuong3]

@RaymondLuong3 made 1 comment and resolved 1 discussion.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on Nateowami).

---

src/SIL.XForge.Scripture/Controllers/OnboardingRequestRpcController.cs line 555 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, Nateowami wrote…

I think XOR would have != semantics. Also, I think == better expresses intent.

That works for me. Not a big deal.