Conversation
froggy1014
requested review from
dev-hobin,
haedawn,
jiji-hoon96,
leejiwonn,
noahluftyang and
synuns
as code owners
|
✅ Deploy Preview for side-design-system ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
WalkthroughAdds a new .coderabbit.yaml configuration defining global review settings, file/path filters, detailed path-specific review instructions (React, vanilla-extract CSS, tests, Storybook, tokens, package/ts/tsup/biome, README), auto-review rules for branches with incremental mode, and chat auto-reply. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant Repo as Repository
participant CR as CodeRabbit
participant PR as Pull Request
Dev->>Repo: Open or update PR
Repo-->>CR: Notify (auto_review enabled)
CR->>CR: Apply path_filters to changed files
CR->>CR: Load matching path_instructions
CR-->>PR: Post review summary, status, and suggestions
CR-->>Dev: Send auto-reply in chat (if configured)
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Tip 🔌 Remote MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration is now available!Pro plan users can now connect to remote MCP servers from the Integrations page. Connect with popular remote MCPs such as Notion and Linear to add more context to your reviews and chats. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
Status, Documentation and Community
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.coderabbit.yaml
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 68-68: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 78-78: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 87-87: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 105-105: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 114-114: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 141-141: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
135-138: Ignore suggested change tobase_branches
There’s no “default-branch-only” setting or author note in this file—your configuration intentionally limits auto-reviews to PRs targeting main and release/v1, which matches what’s in.coderabbit.yaml. If your goal really is to run reviews on every branch, you can replace the list with['.*']; otherwise, no update is needed here.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (5)
.coderabbit.yaml (5)
9-16: Path filters are sensible. Consider excluding coverage and framework output dirs if present.If your repo has these dirs, exclude them to reduce noise and clone size.
Apply this diff:
path_filters: - "!.templates/**" - "!.changeset/**" - "!**/pnpm-lock.yaml" - "!**/node_modules/**" - "!**/dist/**" - "!**/storybook-static/**" - "!**/*.d.ts" + - "!**/coverage/**" + - "!**/.next/**" + - "!**/.output/**"
19-20: Glob patterns are too shallow under src; use recursive globs and add common variants.Using .ext will miss files in nested folders. Widen to **/.ext and consider common test/story variants.
Apply this diff:
- - path: "**/packages/*/src/*.tsx" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.tsx" @@ - - path: "**/packages/*/src/*.css.ts" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.css.ts" @@ - - path: "**/packages/*/src/*.test.tsx" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.test.tsx" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.test.ts" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.spec.tsx" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.spec.ts" @@ - - path: "**/packages/*/src/*.stories.tsx" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.stories.tsx" + - path: "**/packages/*/src/**/*.stories.mdx"Also applies to: 32-33, 45-46, 58-59
45-56: Enhance test guidance with automated a11y checks and keyboard navigationAdd explicit requirements for a11y assertions and keyboard operability.
Apply this diff:
instructions: | Review test files for: - English test descriptions (convert Korean descriptions to English) - Comprehensive test coverage including visual, behavioral, and accessibility tests + - Automated accessibility assertions (e.g., jest-axe or @axe-core/react) + - Keyboard navigation (Tab/Shift+Tab focus order, Enter/Space activation) for interactive components - Theme compatibility testing - ensure components work with different theme variants - Proper use of @testing-library/react patterns - Testing component variants, props, and edge cases - ThemeProvider wrapper in tests when testing theme-dependent components - Consistent test structure and naming conventions - Proper setup and cleanup in test files
69-78: Protect downstreams: add “no breaking token rename without codemod” policy and deprecation flowCodify migration expectations for token changes.
Apply this diff:
instructions: | Review design token changes for: - Backward compatibility with existing components - Consistent naming conventions following established patterns - Proper TypeScript exports and type definitions - Impact on overall design system consistency - Documentation of token usage and purpose + - No breaking token renames unless a codemod/migration (or clear mapping) is provided + - Enforce a deprecation period with a documented replacement token before removal/rename
30-30: Trim trailing whitespace on blank linesYAML linters flag these as trailing-spaces. Remove the spaces (keep the blank lines).
You can auto-fix with:
- npx prettier .coderabbit.yaml --write
- or run yamllint to locate/fix.
Also applies to: 43-43, 56-56, 68-68, 78-78, 87-87, 96-96, 105-105, 114-114
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.coderabbit.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.coderabbit.yaml
[error] 30-30: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 43-43: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 56-56: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 68-68: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 78-78: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 87-87: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 105-105: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 114-114: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: coverage
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.coderabbit.yaml (4)
1-8: Solid global settings blockTop-level keys and review toggles are well-formed and align with the schema.
124-138: Auto-review block is correctly nested and uses the right keyGood fix: auto_review is under reviews and uses auto_incremental_review.
124-138: Minor mismatch with AI summary: key name differsThe AI summary mentions incremental_review, but the config correctly uses auto_incremental_review per schema. No action needed.
139-141: Chat auto-reply enabledLooks good. Keep an eye on noise levels in busy repos.
1 participant
Changes
현재 코드래빗 default branch 외에는 skip 되도록 설정이 되어있더라구요.
그래서 그 설정 변경할겸, 저희 프로젝트에 맞게 프롬프트 추가해봤습니다 ~
Visuals
Checklist
Additional Discussion Points
Summary by CodeRabbit