Skip to content

Conversation

@greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello lovely humans,

eslint just published its new version 3.8.1.

State Update 🚀
Dependency eslint
New version 3.8.1
Type devDependency

This version is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of eslint.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.

Do you have any ideas how I could improve these pull requests? Did I report anything you think isn’t right?
Are you unsure about how things are supposed to work?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and while I’m just a bot, there is a group of people who are happy to teach me new things. Let them know.

Good luck with your project ✨

You rock!

🌴


GitHub Release


The new version differs by 7 commits .

  • 8936e23 3.8.1
  • 3d94af0 Build: package.json and changelog update for 3.8.1
  • 681c78a Fix: comma-dangle was confused by type annotations (fixes #7370) (#7372)
  • 7525042 Fix: Allow useless escapes in tagged template literals (fixes #7383) (#7384)
  • 9106964 Docs: Fix broken link for stylish formatter (#7386)
  • 49d3c1b Docs: Document the deprecated meta property (#7367)
  • 19d2996 Docs: Relax permission for merging PRs (refs eslint/tsc-meetings#20) (#7360)

See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? ⚡ greenkeeper upgrade

@treshugart treshugart merged commit ad0a992 into master Oct 18, 2016
@treshugart treshugart deleted the greenkeeper-eslint-3.8.1 branch October 18, 2016 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants