You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At Euroscipy 2025 I followed a talk about EffVer, and I was wondering if we should make a more conscious effort to use this kind of versioning.
The gist of it is making it more evident when there are bigger changes, and more practically this means that we should not remove features in patches (like we have done in some cases), and instead do that only in minors.
This would also mean having more frequent minor releases, which I don't think is a big problem.
I was thinking of this when I opened #1566, because I think that changing the requirements and deprecating a bunch of stuff warrants a minor release.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
At Euroscipy 2025 I followed a talk about EffVer, and I was wondering if we should make a more conscious effort to use this kind of versioning.
The gist of it is making it more evident when there are bigger changes, and more practically this means that we should not remove features in patches (like we have done in some cases), and instead do that only in minors.
This would also mean having more frequent minor releases, which I don't think is a big problem.
I was thinking of this when I opened #1566, because I think that changing the requirements and deprecating a bunch of stuff warrants a minor release.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions