feat: add Registry field to workflow details header#417
Merged
Conversation
ejacquier
approved these changes
May 7, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
DEVSVCS-4926
This pull request refactors the workflow commands (
activate,delete,deploy, andpause) to use a shared function for displaying workflow details, improving code reuse and consistency across commands. The display logic is now centralized in a newDisplayWorkflowDetailsfunction undercmd/workflow/common. Additionally, the registry ID for on-chain registries is now more descriptive.Improvements
DisplayWorkflowDetailsfunction incmd/workflow/common/display_workflow_details.goto standardize and centralize the display of workflow details across commands. This function also annotates off-chain owner addresses as "(derived)".activate.go,delete.go,deploy.go, andpause.goto use the newDisplayWorkflowDetailsfunction instead of their own localdisplayWorkflowDetailsmethods. Removed the now-redundant local display methods from each command. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]Registry ID improvement:
onchain:<chainName>) for better clarity in logs and UI.