Can generated or uploaded images be reused internally between different tools without downloading and re-uploading them? #357
-
|
Hi, first of all, thank you for creating Snapotter. I really like the concept and the workflow so far. I have a question regarding image processing workflows. When I upload an image and use one of the available tools to modify it, everything works fine. However, if I want to continue working with the resulting image using a different tool or processing pipeline, I currently need to download the generated image locally and upload it again. Is there currently a way to internally pass images between different tools or stages without requiring the user to download and re-upload the image manually? For example:
Is such a workflow already possible, planned for the future, or technically limited by the current architecture? Thanks for your work and for any clarification! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
For normal single-tool pages, this is not available yet in the way you describe. For example, after using Resize, there currently is not a direct “Continue with Compress / Convert / Watermark” action that reuses the result as the next tool’s input. SnapOtter does support internal chaining through Automate / Pipeline Builder, but I agree that is different from a quick post-result handoff inside the normal tool flow. This would make a good feature request. Could you open it in the Ideas category so others can vote/comment on the workflow? https://github.com/snapotter-hq/SnapOtter/discussions/categories/ideas Suggested title: [Feature] Continue tool output in another tool without download/re-upload Useful details to include:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
For normal single-tool pages, this is not available yet in the way you describe. For example, after using Resize, there currently is not a direct “Continue with Compress / Convert / Watermark” action that reuses the result as the next tool’s input.
SnapOtter does support internal chaining through Automate / Pipeline Builder, but I agree that is different from a quick post-result handoff inside the normal tool flow.
This would make a good feature request. Could you open it in the Ideas category so others can vote/comment on the workflow?
https://github.com/snapotter-hq/SnapOtter/discussions/categories/ideas
Suggested title:
[Feature] Continue tool output in another tool without download/re…