Skip to content

Conversation

@snyk-abedonik
Copy link

@snyk-abedonik snyk-abedonik commented Jan 28, 2026

Pull Request Submission Checklist

  • Follows CONTRIBUTING guidelines
  • Commit messages
    are release-note ready, emphasizing
    what was changed, not how.
  • Includes detailed description of changes
  • Contains risk assessment (Low | Medium | High)
  • Highlights breaking API changes (if applicable)
  • Links to automated tests covering new functionality
  • Includes manual testing instructions (if necessary)
  • Updates relevant GitBook documentation (PR link: ___)
  • Includes product update to be announced in the next stable release notes

What does this PR do?

Where should the reviewer start?

How should this be manually tested?

What's the product update that needs to be communicated to CLI users?

@snyk-abedonik snyk-abedonik requested review from a team as code owners January 28, 2026 20:04
@snyk-abedonik snyk-abedonik changed the base branch from main to feature/CSENG-68_AddFFG January 28, 2026 20:04
@snyk-abedonik snyk-abedonik force-pushed the feat/add-acceptance-tests-for-scope branch from 1e1c258 to 8629320 Compare January 28, 2026 20:06
@snyk-abedonik snyk-abedonik changed the title Feat/add acceptance tests for scope feat: add acceptance tests for maven and npm scope [CSENG-122] Jan 28, 2026
@snyk-abedonik snyk-abedonik force-pushed the feat/add-acceptance-tests-for-scope branch 4 times, most recently from 46b4b8b to 9284be7 Compare January 29, 2026 22:30
@snyk-abedonik snyk-abedonik force-pushed the feat/add-acceptance-tests-for-scope branch from 9284be7 to d964e9d Compare January 29, 2026 22:52
@brew42 brew42 merged commit c4a128e into feature/CSENG-68_AddFFG Jan 30, 2026
3 checks passed
@brew42 brew42 deleted the feat/add-acceptance-tests-for-scope branch January 30, 2026 13:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants