docs: remove unnecessary category duplication for data viz libraries#550
Merged
davedbase merged 1 commit intosolidjs:mainfrom Oct 15, 2024
Merged
docs: remove unnecessary category duplication for data viz libraries#550davedbase merged 1 commit intosolidjs:mainfrom
davedbase merged 1 commit intosolidjs:mainfrom
Conversation
thedanchez
force-pushed
the
cleanup-duplication
branch
from
c04b314 to
993a73f
Compare
thedanchez
changed the title
Member
|
Thank you! This works nicely. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just putting this PR up to remove the duplicate entries of these libraries across the different categories. After thinking about it for a bit, I came away with the thought that having all of this duplication across the categories just adds noise in the signal-to-noise ratio when searching for libraries. I feel that these things should be more targeted and granular perhaps?
Feel free to disagree and chuck (read close) this out. But just thought I'd put it up and spark the discussion. If there is agreement on the above premise, then this is something we can iteratively do on the rest of the libraries in the ecosystem list as time goes on.