Stop fetching and parsing thermal constraint file

[jeanconn]

Description

Stop fetching and parsing thermal constraint file.

The thermal constraint file is no longer created by FOT thermal as the outputs are no longer relevant / no longer based on models used by the FOT. The file used to be included in the FOT approved products outputs.

Testing

• [n/a] Passes unit tests - unit tests have not been modernized and are presently disabled in Replan Central.
• Functional Testing:
  In a test version (see wiki for howto) this PR removed the warning "Could not find constraints file for any load version of therm_JAN1022" from the top and the load link was appropriately populated with the link to the approved JAN1022A directory.

[jeanconn]

Given scope, I don't think we need to capture more test outputs etc in the PR.

[jeanconn]

There are probably a few other places where text warnings could be updated to remove anything about "thermal violation events".

[taldcroft]

Yeah, I see at least a couple of or thermal that should be removed. So it's worth searching the code for thermal and assessing if matches still make sense.

[taldcroft]

Otherwise this looks relatively uncontroversial. It's been awhile, so (if it's not too complicated) could you remind me of how you actually ran this in a test version? (And put this in the PR description in a Functional testing section).

And as always it is useful to put in a little backstory about why you are doing this.

[jeanconn]

Right, so for scope if the thermal constraint report isn't available are there any thermal violations that could be tracked by the code?

[jeanconn]

With regard to testing, we've got setup notes on the wiki https://github.com/sot/arc/wiki/Set-up-test-Replan-Central . I figured that there might be other fixes in a replan central release that would go to FSDS and get more test output review.

[taldcroft]

if the thermal constraint report isn't available are there any thermal violations that could be tracked by the code?

I don't believe there are any thermal violations in the PCAD constraint report.

[taldcroft]

I figured that there might be other fixes in a replan central release that would go to FSDS and get more test output review.

Did you have some other changes in mind? Otherwise given the fairly slow release pace for arc this PR might be the driver.

[malgosias]

This PR looks good to me

[jeanconn]

Thanks @malgosias !