Future of assemblrr #1
soulis-1256
announced in
Announcements
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi everyone — this is the start of an open conversation about where assemblrr could go next, and what (if anything) should be built on top of it. Strong opinions are welcome; please keep it respectful and constructive.
Assemblrr itself stays what it is today: a way to bootstrap and wire a self-hosted media stack. This thread is about product vision, not a promise that every idea will ship.
What assemblrr is today
This project aims to be as close as practical to a one-click (or express) setup for most of the *arr stack.
With express install you mainly:
The same credentials are reused across services so you can open each UI quickly and get oriented. That’s weaker than per-service secrets or SSO — I know. For a home lab, many people still want “one password and I’m done.” Manual mode and later hardening can provide options for people who want stricter setups.
Under the hood, the “engine” is still the usual pieces: download client, Radarr/Sonarr, Prowlarr, quality tools, etc. The human-facing surface after a good setup is mostly:
Assemblrr’s job today is to make that engine install and interconnect with as little pain as possible.
Vision: from “stack” to “experience”
If the stack is configured well, the day-to-day mental model shouldn’t be five bookmarks — it should feel closer to a single app:
Mainstream streaming products (like Netflix) already merge catalog + request-ish UX + player. A self-hosted path could aim at the same shape of product, while remaining:
I’m calling that idea a “super-app” for lack of a better name: request library + download/progress visibility + playback of your files. It might be a new UI, a tight integration layer, or evolution of existing projects — this discussion is partly to figure out what is worth building.
Trade-offs I’m already thinking about
1. Separation of concerns vs convenience
Keeping Seerr and Jellyfin separate is often lighter and more flexible:
A combined experience adds some redundancy (storage, and maybe RAM/CPU if everything runs at once) in exchange for convenience:
I’d rather treat that as an explicit product choice (optional unified UI vs classic split apps), not force one model on everyone.
2. Automation vs control
A polished front-end will lean on automation: indexers, quality profiles, “pick a release for me.” That’s great until the automatic choice is wrong — wrong release, bloated size, bad encode, failed grab, etc.
So any “super-app” should not trap people:
In other words: convenience by default, escape hatches when the algorithm guesses poorly. That’s a UX problem for legitimate home libraries and automation generally — not a reason to hide the engine.
What Assemblrr is not
To keep expectations (and the project) clean:
What I’d like feedback on
Maintenance & funding
I don’t currently have the time to maintain this project at the level it deserves. My day-to-day work is building my proprietary applications and projects so I can earn a living — open source has to fit around that, not the other way around.
That means:
If this project is useful to you and you want that future to happen, sponsorships help more than stars alone. You can support via PayPal.
Thanks for reading.
All reactions