- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 69
 
search: add support for streaming search #485
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            7 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      9acfa41
              
                search: add support for streaming search
              
              
                stefanhengl 07b7051
              
                use flagSet.Outpout().Write instead of fmt.Printf
              
              
                stefanhengl 2020d66
              
                use switch instead of if-continue
              
              
                stefanhengl cc73500
              
                add tests
              
              
                stefanhengl fcf959b
              
                count diff/commit results just like on Cloud
              
              
                stefanhengl 5c951db
              
                address PR comments
              
              
                stefanhengl b6017ee
              
                minor: add newline before trace output
              
              
                stefanhengl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
      
      Oops, something went wrong.
        
    
  
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you define
-streamas a noop on the other flagset that you then use instreamHandleryou wouldn't have to do this here, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, but then we mess with the auto-documentation. Suddenly the "streaming search" has a "-stream" flag which is odd. I traded odd code against odd documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not create a separate
stream-searchcommand?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is based on a discussion we had around exhaustive search which is documented in RFC 288. At some point we want phase out -stream and replace search with streaming search. That is part of the reason why I wrote it as handler.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is kind of weird though:
Given we intend on replacing search with stream search in the future, can't we make the stream search stuff not use its own flagset. I would think an approach like
would make sense. Or even you pass in the http client you use that hides the trace/insecure stuff.
That way you can also move the large amounts of business logic out of
./cmd/srcinto./internal/streamingUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually like this behavior, but since both reviewers commented on this I may be on the wrong track here. I refactored it to be a simple function call instead of a handler and moved parts of the logic to internal/streaming.