Add extension copy command #82
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
efritz
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2020
This was referenced Jan 17, 2020
scjohns
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A customer is having difficulty publishing language extensions to their private registry due to internet restrictions, OS package manager restrictions, and an incompatible Node version.
This PR adds the following command:
Internally, it fetches the manifest and bundle from Sourcegraph.com (hard-coded) then publishes them to the current Sourcegraph instance.