Add tests #1
Add tests #1
Conversation
|
This is a benchmark review for experiment This pull request was cloned from Experiment configurationreview_config:
# User configuration for the review
# - benchmark - use the user config from the benchmark reviews
# - <value> - use the value directly
user_config:
enable_ai_review: true
enable_rule_comments: false
enable_complexity_comments: benchmark
enable_docstring_comments: benchmark
enable_security_comments: benchmark
enable_tests_comments: benchmark
enable_comment_suggestions: benchmark
enable_approvals: true
ai_review_config:
# The model responses to use for the experiment
# - benchmark - use the model responses from the benchmark reviews
# - llm - call the language model to generate responses
model_responses:
comments_model: benchmark
comment_validation_model: benchmark
comment_suggestion_model: benchmark
complexity_model: benchmark
docstrings_model: benchmark
security_model: benchmark
tests_model: benchmark
# The pull request dataset to run the experiment on
pull_request_dataset:
- https://github.com/simnova/ownercommunity/pull/73
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/20
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5153
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/19
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/298
- https://github.com/UCL/dxss/pull/63
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/22
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/78
- https://github.com/megasanjay/scholar-stack-mvp/pull/159
- https://github.com/iphysresearch/Eryn/pull/1
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/67
- https://github.com/yaitoo/sqle/pull/42
- https://github.com/fairdataihub/fairdataihub.org/pull/620
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/75
- https://github.com/jkool702/openwrt/pull/41
- https://github.com/osama1998H/spms/pull/57
- https://github.com/simnova/ownercommunity/pull/75
- https://github.com/dciborow/action-pylint/pull/14
- https://github.com/strawberry-graphql/strawberry/pull/3469
- https://github.com/DevCycleHQ/go-server-sdk/pull/248
- https://github.com/shreejitverma/MScFE690-Capstone/pull/7
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/76
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/79
- https://github.com/Bilbottom/grid-hooks/pull/7
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/21
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/73
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/300
- https://github.com/usama-maxenius/image-editor/pull/71
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/kfactory/pull/301
- https://github.com/osama1998H/spms/pull/56
- https://github.com/okisdev/ChatChat/pull/319
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/24
- https://github.com/ShiroePL/EasternTalesShelf/pull/44
- https://github.com/youandvern/efficalc/pull/13
- https://github.com/gdsfactory/gdsfactory/pull/2694
- https://github.com/0ussamaBernou/my-portfolio/pull/6
- https://github.com/0ussamaBernou/my-portfolio/pull/8
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/29
- https://github.com/shreejitverma/MScFE690-Capstone/pull/6
- https://github.com/albumentations-team/albumentations/pull/1679
- https://github.com/osism/python-osism/pull/869
- https://github.com/ElectronicBabylonianLiterature/ebl-api/pull/546
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/70
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/23
- https://github.com/erxes/erxes/pull/5152
- https://github.com/edsonportosilva/OptiCommPy/pull/22
- https://github.com/jquagga/ttt/pull/77
- https://github.com/ShiroePL/EasternTalesShelf/pull/45
- https://github.com/itzlayz/teagram-tl/pull/22
- https://github.com/wassupluke/recipe-emailer/pull/15
review_comment_labels:
- label: correct
question: Is this comment correct?
- label: helpful
question: Is this comment helpful?
- label: comment-type
question: Is the comment type correct?
- label: comment-area
question: Is the comment area correct?
- label: llm-test
question: Should this comment become an LLM test?
# Benchmark reviews generated by running
# python -m scripts.experiment benchmark <experiment_name>
benchmark_reviews: []
|
SourceryAI
left a comment
SourceryAI
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @sourcery-ai-experiments-bot - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟢 General issues: all looks good
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟡 Testing: 3 issues found
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.
| @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ | |||
| import unittest | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (testing): Consider structuring tests to use test fixtures for common setup.
The setUp method is currently empty. Utilizing this for setting up common test parameters or objects used across multiple test methods can make the tests cleaner and reduce redundancy.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this comment become an LLM test?
| result = modulateGray(bits, M, constType) | ||
| self.assertEqual(len(result), len(bits) // int(np.log2(M))) | ||
|
|
||
| def test_demodulateGray(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (testing): Add assertions to verify the correctness of the output values.
The test for demodulateGray checks the length of the result but does not verify that the output values are correct. Adding assertions to check the actual demodulated bits against expected values would strengthen the test.
| def test_demodulateGray(self): | |
| def test_demodulateGray(self): | |
| # Test demodulateGray function with some example inputs | |
| symb = np.array([1+1j, 3+3j, 2+2j]) | |
| expected_bits = [0, 1, 3] # Example expected output | |
| result = demodulateGray(symb, M) | |
| self.assertEqual(result, expected_bits) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this comment become an LLM test?
| b = np.roll(a, -delay) | ||
|
|
||
| assert delay == finddelay(a, b) | ||
| assert delay == -finddelay(b, a) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (testing): Include tests for non-integer and negative delays.
The tests for finddelay function currently handle basic cases. Including scenarios with non-integer and negative delays could help in validating the function's robustness and correctness under more diverse conditions.
| assert delay == -finddelay(b, a) | |
| assert delay == -finddelay(b, a) | |
| assert delay == -finddelay(b + 0.5, a) # Test with non-integer values | |
| assert delay == -finddelay(b, a - 0.5) # Test with non-integer values |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this comment become an LLM test?
Add a tests folder