Pi runtime compatibility baseline#155
Draft
clkao wants to merge 21 commits into
Draft
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
i found https://github.com/nicobailon/pi-subagents and it should make it a lot easier. |
clkao
force-pushed
the
spacedock-ensign/pi-runtime-compatibility-baseline
branch
from
f9c216a to
e24501a
Compare
clkao
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2026
iamcxa
pushed a commit
to iamcxa/spacedock
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2026
Collaborator
Author
|
superseded by #155 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds the first Pi runtime compatibility baseline for Spacedock, including Pi runtime docs, harness support, session-backed worker registry/runtime scaffolding, and live reuse/gate-preflight coverage.\n\nDraft opened from current commit f9c216a; current worktree has additional uncommitted changes that are intentionally not included.\n\nCloses #147