Skip to content

ESCU 6 Unit Testing Facilitation Branch#4096

Draft
pyth0n1c wants to merge 35 commits into
escu_6_workflow_updates_only_no_contentfrom
escu_6
Draft

ESCU 6 Unit Testing Facilitation Branch#4096
pyth0n1c wants to merge 35 commits into
escu_6_workflow_updates_only_no_contentfrom
escu_6

Conversation

@pyth0n1c
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pyth0n1c pyth0n1c commented May 21, 2026

DO NOT MERGE THIS PR

This PR should not be merged.
It only exists to facilitate unit testing of ESCU 6 content.

Due to the way that the unit_testing workflow functions, it requires that workflow changes be present both in a PR's source branch as well as the target branch of that PR.
This is why the escu_6 PR, currently targeted against develop, is expected to fail unit-testing - those unit-testing workflow updates do not (yet) exist in the develop branch: #4082

This PR exists as an intermediary so that unit-testing can run on changed content before the develop branch has been updated.

When it is time to merge the escu_6 PR to develop, this branch should simply be closed out.

pyth0n1c and others added 26 commits May 13, 2026 14:02
…could not be git moved AND updated in the same operation because git instead interpreted this as deleting the old file and creating a new one. To preserve git history, the files have been moved in this commit and will be updated in the next commit.
…entionally moved, but not updated, have now been updated with the new format.
…t missing from here - notably content which has a MANUAL_REVIEW flag. This content does not parse until it has been updated, which means it could not be compiled into the schemas. These files will be updated when all content in the repo successfully parses.
Co-authored-by: Nasreddine Bencherchali <nasreddineb@splunk.com>
…tions

in playbooks that were previously unvalidated.
Add a MANUAL_REVIEW section, which is commented out,
for clarity and to allow CICD to run and pass on this content.
Renamed an existing playbook because it diverges from the name
of that playbook elsewhere.
@pyth0n1c pyth0n1c added the WIP DO NOT MERGE Work in Progress label May 21, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants