Skip to content
View quantapix's full-sized avatar

Block or report quantapix

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
quantapix/README.md

quantapix

Engineering practice. Two products, one method, two domains.

The method: wrap a Lean4 kernel around LLM-backed predicate functions. Predicates return Booleans with evidence. The kernel composes the proof. The two products are Qnarre — an axiomatic verifier for legal complaints — and Qresev — an axiomatic evaluator for stocks and portfolios. Same kernel, different statutes, different OHLCV. Both ship as early-beta on or about 2026-06-01, each with a live trace: every True or False the system returns is anchored to a quoted source.

  • https://quantapix.com — engineering output (code, schemas, traces, framework specs).
  • https://femfas.net — motivational record. The system that was specced from the inside — federal civil-rights litigation, pro se, against an institutional defendant. The long version. quantapix.com is the short one.

Team

Two contributors. One software developer; one expert AI assistant.

  • Imre Kifor — sole developer. Engineering, statute encoding, predicate authoring, kernel design, product surfaces.
  • Claude Code (Opus) — third teammate. Per-task subagents under written CLAUDE.md contracts; persistent semantic memory across sessions; auditable tool use. The assistant writes, reviews, and refactors against the same kernel and predicates the developer reads.

Real, life-altering problems are excellent system specs. They refuse to let you cheat. Don't reduce a claim to opinion. Reduce it to a proof. Have a kernel that does no I/O check the proof. Have predicates — small, replaceable, audited — read the natural language the kernel won't touch. The result is a derivation, not a narrative; it survives a hostile reader because there is nothing to disagree with that isn't checkable.

Why these public repos exist

AI is rapidly commoditizing software code. For a sole-developer practice — where coordination between developers is not a concern — what is worth sharing publicly is no longer the code itself. It is the AI-assisted workflows that produce the code, and specifically the workflows that:

  1. support learning — where to read, what to skip, what to write down, what to drop into the agent's prompt;
  2. attract attention — concise public artifacts that make the thesis legible to readers who haven't lived the engineering;
  3. convey how a product works (or how it should be used) once the product is shipping.

Until Qnarre and Qresev start early beta on or about 2026-06-01, the public surface of this organisation is the first two of the three: learning and attention. Both are weekly-refreshed curated windows into the private working repository's activities.

Public repos under this organisation

Repo Role Cadence
qstudying Lean4 expert-track focus areas + OSS contribution targets that back proving/ (Qnarre) and accounting/ (Qresev). The "where to read, what to write down" companion. weekly-refreshed
qexplaining 50-video explainer arc (5 topics × 10 subjects), narrated by Janet, brand-synced with the two product sites. The "convey how it works" companion, scoped to the pre-beta window. weekly-refreshed

The two products' own repositories will join this list when they ship.

Contact

quantapix@gmail.com is the only contact channel.

License

Each public repo carries its own LICENSE (MIT for the three scripts-only repos: quantapix, qstudying, qexplaining).

Popular repositories Loading

  1. quantapix quantapix Public

  2. qexplaining qexplaining Public

  3. qstudying qstudying Public