Skip to content

Bump dependencies#142

Merged
protocol7 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
ngn/bump-dependencies
Aug 6, 2019
Merged

Bump dependencies#142
protocol7 merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
ngn/bump-dependencies

Conversation

@protocol7
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Including taking care of some incompatible API changes. Nothing visible
in the Folsom API though.
@protocol7 protocol7 force-pushed the ngn/bump-dependencies branch from 8e835f5 to 170275a Compare August 5, 2019 07:31
@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at ?% when pulling 170275a on ngn/bump-dependencies into 01bd189 on master.

@davidpoblador
Copy link
Copy Markdown

LGTM

ForkJoinPool.defaultForkJoinWorkerThreadFactory,
new UncaughtExceptionHandler(),
true))
::get;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Guess we could type the Supplier field and constants as the Guava one to avoid the ::get calls here but I'm not sure if that's better.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I was considering the same. But in general I'd like to lessen our use of Guava in Folsom, and that would be a step in the wrong direction. I was also considering adding a local memoize function instead, using only java.util.function.Supplier, but decided to rather do so in a future PR.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense. 👍

@protocol7 protocol7 merged commit d029f92 into master Aug 6, 2019
@protocol7 protocol7 deleted the ngn/bump-dependencies branch August 6, 2019 18:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants