Skip to content

Conversation

@emmanuelmathot
Copy link
Member

This PR to add a possible link to the processing itself

@emmanuelmathot emmanuelmathot requested a review from m-mohr August 16, 2023 08:27
@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

m-mohr commented Aug 16, 2023

via is already used here for a different purpose:
https://github.com/radiantearth/stac-spec/blob/fd8fb4e3cf0b6c4a0fe74822accbc1725a92f92a/best-practices.md?plain=1#L650

We need to clarify how we can distinguish the use-cases.

@emmanuelmathot
Copy link
Member Author

emmanuelmathot commented Aug 16, 2023

right, I forgot that one.
Maybe a dedicated link relationship should be used.
provenance or origin

@m-mohr
Copy link
Contributor

m-mohr commented Aug 16, 2023

What exactly would you use these links for? What are they pointing to?
How does it differentiate from processing-expression?

@matthewhanson
Copy link
Member

Discussed in STAC sprint.

This would be a helpful link relation, looking for suggestions on a more appropriate name.

See https://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml

@emmanuelmathot emmanuelmathot self-assigned this Sep 28, 2023
@emmanuelmathot emmanuelmathot changed the title Add via link for traceability Add processing execution link for traceability Sep 28, 2023
@m-mohr m-mohr merged commit 4057e76 into main Apr 4, 2024
@m-mohr m-mohr deleted the source branch April 4, 2024 09:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants