Conversation
|
Multi-arch is tested and working. Can we remove the shas from our own build images(e.g. stackable-base)? If not, if we should change somewhen to full multi arch builds, we have to remember to update those to the manifest list sha. |
Changelogs updated.
These hashes are already the hashes of the manifest lists. The manifest list currently contains only the image with the linux/amd64 architecture but that should be okay for now. |
Maleware
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've rebuild this stuff as multi arch from the scratch and it works for me. Approved.
|
Shall we add something to the release checklist to remember to look at upgrading Vector if needed? @adwk67 |
|
We're having a look at how best to deal with the base images: either (just) as a checklist item here, or to build the base images as a preliminary step prior to building the product images (in the same github action). |
|
And upgrading things like Vector would be part of that, right? |
|
Yes: I've added an explicit comment to stackabletech/issues#314 |
Add stackable-base and vector images and base the zookeeper image onto them.
A java-based product image now consists of the layers
ubi-minimal,stackable-base,vector, and the product image itself.These extended images are used for the log aggregation (stackabletech/issues#295).