Skip to content

Conversation

@razvan
Copy link
Member

@razvan razvan commented Dec 12, 2025

Description

Part of stackabletech/issues#806

Secret class tls has no owner ref anymore:

$ k get secretclass tls -o yaml
apiVersion: secrets.stackable.tech/v1alpha2
kind: SecretClass
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2025-12-15T13:25:18Z"
  generation: 1
  labels:
    app.kubernetes.io/managed-by: secrets.stackable.tech_secretclass
    app.kubernetes.io/name: secrets.stackable.tech
    stackable.tech/vendor: Stackable
  name: tls
  resourceVersion: "31202"
  uid: 079bceb0-7014-4ce3-84d5-e5aaaddd501d
spec:
...

🟢 Tests:

Tested with the OLM manifests for the fictional 25.11.1 release from the fix/secret-no-owner-for-cluster-resources branch.

--- PASS: kuttl (164.78s)
    --- PASS: kuttl/harness (0.00s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/listener_openshift-true (35.76s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls-truststore_openshift-true_truststore-target-kind-Secret (11.40s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/kerberos_krb5-1.21.1_openshift-true (63.61s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls-truststore_openshift-true_truststore-target-kind-ConfigMap (10.26s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-3072_custom-secret-names-False (34.49s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/cert-manager-tls_openshift-true (81.70s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-3072_custom-secret-names-True (37.33s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-2048_custom-secret-names-True (17.88s)
        --- PASS: kuttl/harness/tls_openshift-true_rsa-key-length-2048_custom-secret-names-False (18.19s)
PASS

@razvan razvan marked this pull request as ready for review December 15, 2025 14:00
@razvan razvan moved this to Development: Waiting for Review in Stackable Engineering Dec 15, 2025
@razvan razvan requested a review from a team December 15, 2025 14:30
@adwk67 adwk67 requested review from adwk67 and removed request for a team December 16, 2025 09:19
@adwk67 adwk67 moved this from Development: Waiting for Review to Development: In Review in Stackable Engineering Dec 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@adwk67 adwk67 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@razvan razvan added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit d90e550 Dec 16, 2025
12 checks passed
@razvan razvan deleted the fix/olm-no-owner-for-cluster-objects branch December 16, 2025 09:50
@adwk67 adwk67 moved this from Development: In Review to Development: Done in Stackable Engineering Dec 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Development: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants