Skip to content

[Merged by Bors] - Support specifying Service type#406

Closed
sbernauer wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
feat/service-type
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - Support specifying Service type#406
sbernauer wants to merge 7 commits intomainfrom
feat/service-type

Conversation

@sbernauer
Copy link
Member

Description

For stackabletech/issues#360

Please add a description here. This will become the commit message of the merge request later.

Definition of Done Checklist

  • Not all of these items are applicable to all PRs, the author should update this template to only leave the boxes in that are relevant
  • Please make sure all these things are done and tick the boxes
# Author
- [ ] Changes are OpenShift compatible
- [ ] CRD changes approved
- [ ] Helm chart can be installed and deployed operator works
- [ ] Integration tests passed (for non trivial changes)
# Reviewer
- [ ] Code contains useful comments
- [ ] (Integration-)Test cases added
- [ ] Documentation added or updated
- [ ] Changelog updated
- [ ] Cargo.toml only contains references to git tags (not specific commits or branches)
# Acceptance
- [ ] Feature Tracker has been updated
- [ ] Proper release label has been added

Once the review is done, comment bors r+ (or bors merge) to merge. Further information

@sbernauer sbernauer force-pushed the feat/service-type branch from 15998f7 to 003ad61 Compare April 4, 2023 08:25
@sbernauer sbernauer self-assigned this Apr 4, 2023
@sbernauer sbernauer requested a review from a team April 4, 2023 08:39
Copy link
Member

@maltesander maltesander left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if we agreed on the listener_class names :)

sbernauer and others added 2 commits April 5, 2023 08:05
Co-authored-by: Malte Sander <contact@maltesander.com>
@sbernauer
Copy link
Member Author

We chatted about this in #product-listener and decided to stick with the current names

@sbernauer
Copy link
Member Author

@sbernauer
Copy link
Member Author

Test failed, but I think it's normal flakiness

@sbernauer
Copy link
Member Author

@sbernauer
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+
Test passed

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2023
# Description

For stackabletech/issues#360

*Please add a description here. This will become the commit message of the merge request later.*
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Apr 6, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into main.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title Support specifying Service type [Merged by Bors] - Support specifying Service type Apr 6, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Apr 6, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the feat/service-type branch April 6, 2023 10:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants