[codex] Include SARIF in example artifact checks#62
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Brief Design Summary
This PR extends the example artifact regeneration check to include the strict-policy SARIF sample.
scripts/regenerate-example-artifacts.py --checknow regeneratesexamples/sample-sarif.sarifthrough the public CLI and normalizesoriginalUriBaseIds.%SRCROOT%.uritofile:///__PROJECT_ROOT__/so checked-in output does not depend on a maintainer's local checkout path.The docs now describe that the regeneration script covers local JSON, Markdown, summary, policy sidecar, and strict-policy SARIF examples. Provenance-aware and Scorecard-aware enriched SARIF samples remain covered by their focused golden tests.
Files Changed
tools/sbom-diff-and-risk/scripts/regenerate-example-artifacts.pytools/sbom-diff-and-risk/docs/example-artifact-regeneration.mdtools/sbom-diff-and-risk/docs/reviewer-evidence-pack.mdtools/sbom-diff-and-risk/README.mdValidation
Results:
strict-policy SARIF reportpython -m pytest: 163 passedpython -m build: passed, producedsbom_diff_and_risk-0.9.0wheel and sdistpython -m twine check: passed for wheel and sdistgit diff --check: passed0.9.0.github/workflowsunchangedOut of Scope