Fix GKE#80
Merged
Merged
Conversation
added 2 commits
April 7, 2026 19:21
…wise we will get an architecture mismatch
AlexVulaj
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
AlexVulaj
reviewed
Apr 7, 2026
AlexVulaj
approved these changes
Apr 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I finally wanted to fix deployments to GKE when using containerized roxie.
I figured out it fails due to two distinct problems:
gcloud installstep to the runtime stage.it kept failing -- the initial attempt to use the GKE auth plugin failed because it was lacking write permissions to some files (several!) in ~/.config/gcloud, even though I instructed ownership translation using the
:Umount flag. Hypothesis: there is likely to be some kind of race caused by the container starting up even though the file permissions in ~/.config/gcloud are not really effective immediately during container startup. I have verified that adding a dumb delay mitigates this. So, this PR also contains a simply retry mechanism for the initialization, which seems to do the trick. See: