Skip to content

Add missing gold_passages_retrieved function #830

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024
Merged

Add missing gold_passages_retrieved function #830

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions docs/docs/tutorials/simplified-baleen.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -193,6 +193,14 @@ Let's now define our evaluation function and compare the performance of the unco
```python
from dspy.evaluate.evaluate import Evaluate

# Define metric to check if we retrieved the correct documents
def gold_passages_retrieved(example, pred, trace=None):
gold_titles = set(map(dspy.evaluate.normalize_text, example["gold_titles"]))
found_titles = set(
map(dspy.evaluate.normalize_text, [c.split(" | ")[0] for c in pred.context])
)
return gold_titles.issubset(found_titles)

# Set up the `evaluate_on_hotpotqa` function. We'll use this many times below.
evaluate_on_hotpotqa = Evaluate(devset=devset, num_threads=1, display_progress=True, display_table=5)

Expand Down