Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 57 minutes and 20 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughMultiple npm dependencies were updated in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
17-21: Consider movingprettierandtypescripttodevDependencies.These are usually build-time tools, not runtime dependencies.
Proposed `package.json` diff
"dependencies": { "@astrojs/check": "0.9.8", "@astrojs/sitemap": "3.7.2", "@astrojs/starlight": "0.38.3", "astro": "6.1.7", - "prettier": "3.8.3", "sharp": "0.34.5", "starlight-blog": "0.26.1", - "starlight-links-validator": "0.23.0", - "typescript": "6.0.2" + "starlight-links-validator": "0.23.0" + }, + "devDependencies": { + "prettier": "3.8.3", + "typescript": "6.0.2" }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@package.json` around lines 17 - 21, The package.json currently lists "prettier" and "typescript" under the top-level dependencies; move these two entries into devDependencies instead (preserve their versions "3.8.3" and "6.0.2") so they are installed only for development/build time; update package.json by removing "prettier" and "typescript" from the dependencies object and adding them to the devDependencies object (or create devDependencies if missing), then run your package manager to sync installs.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@package.json`:
- Around line 17-21: The package.json currently lists "prettier" and
"typescript" under the top-level dependencies; move these two entries into
devDependencies instead (preserve their versions "3.8.3" and "6.0.2") so they
are installed only for development/build time; update package.json by removing
"prettier" and "typescript" from the dependencies object and adding them to the
devDependencies object (or create devDependencies if missing), then run your
package manager to sync installs.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: d9ec8158-381f-4964-b47f-a845cd69c145
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
package.jsonsrc/content.config.ts
Summary by CodeRabbit