fix(auto-itemize): extract invoiceNumber+notes via LLM, fix sticky PDF (#1581)#1582
Merged
Merged
Conversation
#1581) The LLM JSON schema for budget extraction was missing `invoiceNumber` and `notes` fields, so those values were never returned even when the model successfully identified them. The schema in `budgetExtraction.ts`, the prompt in `prompts.ts`, and the provider profiles were updated to include both fields, and the `openAICompatibleProvider` now maps them through to the extraction result. The `invoiceAutoItemizeService` now propagates `invoiceNumber` and `notes` from the extraction result into the auto-itemize response. The `AutoItemizePage` displays both fields in the extraction summary card once results arrive, giving users a quick confirmation that the LLM found the right invoice metadata without having to navigate away. The PDF viewer inside `AutoItemizePage` was not staying fixed while the user scrolled the results panel. The CSS was reworked so the PDF iframe takes a full-viewport sticky column and the results panel scrolls independently, resolving the sticky/full-viewport layout regression introduced in #1577. Fixes #1581 Co-Authored-By: Claude backend-developer (Haiku 4.5) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude frontend-developer (Haiku 4.5) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude qa-integration-tester (Sonnet 4.5) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude e2e-test-engineer (Sonnet 4.5) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.7.0-beta.16 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
invoiceNumberandnotesfields so the model's identified metadata is actually returned in extraction resultsinvoiceNumberandnotesthroughinvoiceAutoItemizeServiceand displayed them in theAutoItemizePageextraction summary cardFixes #1581
Test plan
qa-integration-tester)invoiceNumber+notesappear in the results UI (e2e-test-engineer)Co-Authored-By: Claude dev-team-lead (Sonnet 4.6) noreply@anthropic.com