Skip to content

[safety] Inconsistent use of "*X* safe operation" #48

@lucteo

Description

@lucteo

The document defines X safe operation through:

An X safe operation upholds some safety property X even if preconditions are violated.

Later on the document drops the X qualification:

A safe operation will never exhibit undefined behavior, even if preconditions are violated.

The document should use the X qualification in all places, or add a footnote explaining why it doesn't add value anymore.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions