[RFC] Feedback on Storybook’s contribution review bot

We’re trying a new review process for contributions to Storybook. Before a maintainer reviews a PR closely, a bot can review it in three stages: architecture, code quality, and runtime verification. A human maintainer still reviews the bot’s feedback and makes the decisions.

We’d like to hear how this works for contributors. If the bot has commented on your PR, please leave your feedback in this discussion. Links to specific PR comments are especially helpful, but you’re welcome to share a general impression too.

Some things we’d like to learn:

• Was the feedback accurate and relevant to your change?
• Was it clear what you needed to do next?
• What should we keep, change, or stop doing?

You can also tell us if the bot got something wrong. This is an experiment, and concrete examples will help us improve it.