fix: address sync review feedback

[stranske]

Summary

• scope draft ready-for-review checks to explicit Tasks/Acceptance Criteria sections instead of unrelated PR-template checklists
• restore repo-local follow-up acceptance filtering and Why-section hints for verifier follow-ups
• correct label docs for verify:create-issue under the consolidated PR event hub

Validation

• python -m pytest tests/test_followup_issue_generator.py -q
• node --test .github/scripts/tests/keepalive-orchestrator-gate-runner.test.js
• python scripts/validate_template_sync.py
• git diff --check

Consumer review source: stranske/Pension-Data#364

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[stranske-keepalive]

Automated Status Summary

Head SHA: 8e86fed
Latest Runs: ⏳ pending — Gate
Required contexts: Gate / gate, Health 45 Agents Guard / guard
Required: core tests (3.12): ⏳ pending, core tests (3.13): ⏳ pending, docker smoke: ⏳ pending, gate: ⏳ pending

Workflow / Job	Result	Logs
(no jobs reported)	⏳ pending	—

Coverage Overview

• Coverage history entries: 1

Coverage Trend

Metric	Value
Current	93.12%
Baseline	85.00%
Delta	+8.12%
Minimum	70.00%
Status	✅ Pass

Top Coverage Hotspots (lowest coverage)

File	Coverage	Missing
src/cli_parser.py	81.8%	4
src/percentile_calculator.py	95.0%	1
src/aggregator.py	95.0%	2
src/__init__.py	100.0%	0
src/ndjson_parser.py	100.0%	0

Updated automatically; will refresh on subsequent CI/Docker completions.

---

Keepalive checklist

Scope

No scope information available

Tasks

• No tasks defined

Acceptance criteria

• No acceptance criteria defined

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 427be76714

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Keep counting checklist items across nested subheadings

When a draft PR body has a Tasks/Acceptance Criteria section that includes an internal heading (for example ### Phase 2 under #### Tasks), this branch clears section and stops collecting subsequent checkboxes, so unchecked items can be skipped and the PR can be auto-marked ready incorrectly. This is a real path because our parser explicitly allows subsection headers inside checklist sections (.github/scripts/issue_scope_parser.js notes that ### Phase 1 inside #### Tasks should remain content), so this logic can undercount unchecked work and bypass human routing.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[stranske]

Closing as superseded by current main. The actionable review concern on this branch was about section-scoped checklist counting across nested headings; current main no longer uses that section-reset approach for draft disposition and counts markdown checkboxes directly, so this stale dirty branch should not be merged.