Skip to content

Conversation

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member

@mulkieran mulkieran commented Oct 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected terminology in design and architecture documentation.

Signed-off-by: the Mulhern <amulhern@amulhern.bos.csb>
@mulkieran mulkieran self-assigned this Oct 28, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Walkthrough

A single typographical correction was applied to the Stratis Software Design documentation, fixing the misspelling "exectutables" to "executables" in the OS Integration: Boot and initrd section. No functional logic or behavioral changes were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Typo Correction
docs/design/StratisSoftwareDesign.lyx
Corrects misspelled word "exectutables" to "executables" in the OS Integration: Boot and initrd section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

This is a straightforward documentation fix with no technical logic or code changes to evaluate.

Poem

🐰 A typo hopped away with glee,
"exectutables" no more shall be!
With "executables" spelled just right,
The docs now shine with textual delight! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "Fix typo: exectutable" accurately describes the primary change in the changeset, which is correcting a typographical error in documentation where "exectutables" was changed to "executables". While the title shows a slightly different form of the misspelling ("exectutable" vs "exectutables"), it clearly refers to the same word being corrected. The title is concise, specific, and appropriate for a trivial documentation fix, making it immediately clear to anyone reviewing the change history that this PR addresses a spelling error related to the word "executables".
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f628d66 and 1e7593e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/design/StratisSoftwareDesign.lyx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: spelling-checks
  • GitHub Check: docs-checks
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/design/StratisSoftwareDesign.lyx (1)

4938-4941: Typo fix looks good.

The correction from "exectutables" to "executables" is accurate and properly scoped. The documentation text now reads correctly: "This can be accessed through the stratis-min and stratisd-min executables."


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mulkieran mulkieran moved this to In Review in 2025October Oct 28, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran merged commit 51dfeb5 into stratis-storage:master Oct 28, 2025
5 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in 2025October Oct 28, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran deleted the fix-typo-exectutable branch October 28, 2025 16:21
@mulkieran mulkieran moved this from Done to Done(3) in 2025October Nov 4, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran moved this from Done(3) to Done(4) in 2025October Nov 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done(4)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant