update extensibility SDK name in comments

[xavdid-stripe]

Why?

The Stripe Apps team asked that we update the name of their SDK in our comments

What?

• update comments

See Also

RUN_DEVSDK-2299

[jar-stripe]

We should change this entirely. Since we're vendoring the code copied from that SDK, examples should be written to be relative to this SDK and not the other one.
E,.g

 * ```ts
 * declare module '@stripe/apps-extensibility-sdk/stdlib' {
 *   interface DecimalRoundingPresets {
 *     'my-custom-preset': DecimalRoundingOptions;
 *   }
 * }
 *

should actually be something like

 * ```ts
 * declare module 'stripe' {
 *   interface DecimalRoundingPresets {
 *     'my-custom-preset': DecimalRoundingOptions;
 *   }
 * }
 *

[xavdid-stripe]

Fair, i've updated!

I've updated the docs so that they work, but i'm a little concerned that we're not exporting the things the doc expects. For instance, you can't type something as a Stripe.Decimal, since it's only exported as a class, not a type. So a user couldn't write a function that accepted a stripe decimal type, for instance.

Do we need to update our exports?

[xavdid-stripe]

This wouldn't have worked - everything is imported under the root Stripe namespace

[jar-stripe]

For instance, you can't type something as a Stripe.Decimal, since it's only exported as a class, not a type. So a user couldn't write a function that accepted a stripe decimal type, for instance.

My understanding was that if exported but not as a type, you can do anything with it (i.e. its only restricted if its a type export). I'll confirm.

[jar-stripe]

For instance, you can't type something as a Stripe.Decimal, since it's only exported as a class, not a type. So a user couldn't write a function that accepted a stripe decimal type, for instance.

My understanding was that if exported but not as a type, you can do anything with it (i.e. its only restricted if its a type export). I'll confirm.

You are in fact correct. I'll put up a PR.

[xavdid-stripe]

You're welcome to take this one over! It came in as a run ticket so I was grabbing, but you seem to have a lot more context

[jar-stripe]

Folded into #2634 — the stale @stripe/apps-extensibility-sdk/stdlib comments were deleted entirely rather than renamed.