Change more references to left/right in tests

[sergiobuj]

The issue #235 has the context for this change and the suggested naming.
In this change, not all references are ref_mp/comp_mp but ref/comp in some cases. Please let me know if those still look good.

This is the final change to close #235

---

Checklist:

• Run ./setup.sh && ./test.sh in the root stumpy directory

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #265 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #265   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           18        18           
  Lines         1601      1601           
=========================================
  Hits          1601      1601           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ea379cb...3f4df19. Read the comment docs.

[seanlaw]

Thank you! I will take a look

[seanlaw]

Great work @sergiobuj! This is ready to be merged.

I understand that you've had limited exposure to the codebase but I was also wondering if you had noticed anything else, in general, that could be improved? Any feedback/criticism will not be taken personally 😅

[sergiobuj]

I understand that you've had limited exposure to the codebase but I was also wondering if you had noticed anything else, in general, that could be improved? Any feedback/criticism will not be taken personally 😅

I didn't come across anything that I wanted to change immediately. I had trouble finding a couple of functions in the readthedocs site, but maybe I didn't look in the right place.

I wanted to thank you for the fast responses and reviews!

[seanlaw]

Awesome! Since I jumped the gun last time, is the corresponding issue ready to be closed now?

[seanlaw]

I had trouble finding a couple of functions in the readthedocs site, but maybe I didn't look in the right place.

That is good feedback. Currently, only publicly supported functions are listed in our documentation (even though we have many functions that are not preceded by _function_name).

[sergiobuj]

Awesome! Since I jumped the gun last time, is the corresponding issue ready to be closed now?

Yes, ready to close. I believe I covered all the relevant places.

[seanlaw]

Thank you again and have a wonderful weekend!