Skip to content

Conversation

@pcarruscag
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@TobiKattmann TobiKattmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this is WIP but anyway. Thanks for working on this vandv addition 💐

Please make sure to draw a clear distinction between what is available in the regression tests and what results you produced for this validation case. On the first read I was a bit confused tbh

And maybe just a note on whether you made any changes (beyond the obvious limiter and convective scheme switches) between cases, especially for the refined version.

_vandv/swbli.md Outdated
Comment on lines 41 to 42
Given the focus of this validation case (interaction between a shock and a boundary layer) it is of particular interest to analyze how well CFD predicts the

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is of particular interest to analyze how well CFD predicts the ... the suspense is killing me 👀

@pcarruscag pcarruscag changed the title [WIP] V&V M5 SWBLI V&V M5 SWBLI Jun 3, 2022
@pcarruscag pcarruscag merged commit 8276fa3 into develop Jun 4, 2022
@pcarruscag pcarruscag deleted the vandv_swbli branch June 4, 2022 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants