Merged
Conversation
Logiquo
added
bug
jhnwu3
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2025
Collaborator
jhnwu3
left a comment
jhnwu3
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's a really good catch. I think in the future, it might be worth making fit() a base unimplemented function of BaseProcessor just to enforce some things (ofc make it optional). I never even noticed.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Contributor: Yongda Fan (yongdaf2@illinois.edu)
Contribution Type: Processor
Description
Fix incorrect behaviour of SequenceProcessor that fit the schema in the
processcall. This is a pre-req for #687Files to Review
pyhealth/processors/sequence_processor.py