Skip to content

Conversation

@cangqiaoyuzhuo
Copy link
Contributor

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix

What is the current behavior?

In fact, err is incorrect and should be terr.

What is the new behavior?

Feel free to include screenshots if it includes visual changes.

Additional context

Add any other context or screenshots.

Signed-off-by: cangqiaoyuzhuo <850072022@qq.com>
@cangqiaoyuzhuo cangqiaoyuzhuo requested a review from a team as a code owner March 2, 2025 07:59
@cstockton
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like a legitimate bug to me, I also don't see any potential BC break issues unless we don't want to error out when we fail to destroy the flow state.

@hf Good if I approve & merge this?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 10, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 20113575344

Details

  • 0 of 1 (0.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 68.527%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
internal/api/token.go 0 1 0.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 20113555403: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 14682
Relevant Lines: 21425

💛 - Coveralls

@cstockton
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry for the delay here! I'll merge after tests run.

@cstockton cstockton merged commit e2dfb5d into supabase:master Dec 10, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants