Skip to content

Conversation

@o-santi
Copy link
Contributor

@o-santi o-santi commented Oct 24, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

The current CI conventional commits checker is extremely buggy, and fails randomly when markdown is included in the PR description. Instead, I substituted it by the swift one, which only checks the PR title.

@o-santi o-santi requested a review from grdsdev October 24, 2025 17:49
@grdsdev
Copy link
Contributor

grdsdev commented Oct 24, 2025

Please also remove the .github/workflows/conventional-commits-lint.js script.

@o-santi
Copy link
Contributor Author

o-santi commented Oct 24, 2025

Thank you for noticing.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 18791963433

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 93.876%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 18787712767: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 8799
Relevant Lines: 9373

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants