fix: link offscreen items and last effect in each block correctly (alternative) #17244
+80
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's possible that due to how new elements are inserted into the array that `effect.last` is wrong. We need to ensure it is really the last item to keep items properly connected to the graph. In addition we link offscreen items after all onscreen items, to ensure they don't have wrong pointers. Fixes #17201
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 60de03c The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
6 tasks
Contributor
|
dummdidumm
approved these changes
Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alternative to #17240. I think this is the correct fix — one of the things I learned during #17191 was that the logic belongs inside
link, notreconcile, so that it happens correctly if branches are destroyed after an outro. This also avoids the extra book-keeping and map traversal in #17240.Before submitting the PR, please make sure you do the following
feat:,fix:,chore:, ordocs:.packages/svelte/src, add a changeset (npx changeset).Tests and linting
pnpm testand lint the project withpnpm lint