-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
FAQ
No. The project generates a deterministic ESX-style package and readable XML output, but it does not claim to be a proprietary native XACTDOC.ZIPXML writer.
For the exact assumptions, read:
Yes, on a best-effort basis. The app can apply local OCR when pages appear scan-heavy or text-poor. Results still depend on scan quality and layout clarity.
Yes. The wiki is the fast surface layer. docs_repo/ in the main repository is the deeper technical source of truth.
Yes. That is one of the highest-value contribution areas.
Start here:
It can, if you are using a packaged Windows build from a release artifact. If no packaged release asset is available, you will need to run from source or build the executable locally.
Use the repository issue templates:
Check the generated *.canonical.json first.
- if the canonical file is already wrong, the problem is usually in ingestion or parsing
- if the canonical file looks right but the XML/package looks wrong, the problem is usually in mapping or export
No. Roof-related measurements are an important supported field family, but the project is broader than roofing-only use cases.
No. The app is real and usable today, but layout coverage is still evolving and should not be overstated.
Main repository | Deep docs in docs_repo | Issues
docs_repo/ in the main repository is the authoritative deep technical source of truth.