Automating testing of C libraries. #307
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
JoshuaGross
force-pushed
the
jgross-automate-c-tests
branch
from
b454733 to
d4744d7
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Note that the commits are split into the code-generation bits, and the generated code. |
… and generally clean up the template.
mookerji
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2015
Automating testing of C libraries.
akleeman
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2021
…hub-readme Re-format GitHub readme Triggered-By: check e05766540eba58ae46da2e2bfce4cc4212488c98
akleeman
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2021
…hub-readme (#913) Re-format GitHub readme Triggered-By: check e05766540eba58ae46da2e2bfce4cc4212488c98
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Generate C tests. There are a bunch of tests that are failing on decoded field values which makes me think there may actually be bugs in the library, or I'm misunderstanding these results. I'd appreciate some feedback either way.
@mookerji @jacobmcnamee @mfine @gsmcmullin