-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
Reduce with inout #587
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reduce with inout #587
Conversation
proposals/XXXX-reduce-with-inout.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ | |||
| # Feature name | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't forget to add a name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
chriseidhof
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is ready for review!
proposals/XXXX-reduce-with-inout.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ | |||
| # Feature name | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
|
Replacing existing In other words, while I welcome a mutating reduce, I'm against keeping two versions of |
Opening the PR so that the proposal can already be commented on. There is still an active discussion going on about the naming, but the rest is pretty clear and agreed upon.