Skip to content

Use CodeBlockItemListSyntax instead of ExprSyntax when constructing a test function thunk. #50

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2023
Merged

Use CodeBlockItemListSyntax instead of ExprSyntax when constructing a test function thunk. #50

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 1 addition & 5 deletions Sources/TestingMacros/TestDeclarationMacro.swift
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -308,11 +308,7 @@ public struct TestDeclarationMacro: PeerMacro, Sendable {
}

// Generate a thunk function that invokes the actual function.
// NOTE: `thunkBody` is not actually an expression. It's better-represented
// as an instance of CodeBlockItemListSyntax, but due to its size it is
// easier to express using string interpolation than by directly creating an
// instance of CodeBlockItemListSyntax.
var thunkBody: ExprSyntax
var thunkBody: CodeBlockItemListSyntax
if functionDecl.availability(when: .unavailable).first != nil {
thunkBody = ""
} else if let typeName {
Expand Down