Skip to content

Conversation

@ux-git
Copy link
Member

@ux-git ux-git commented Oct 20, 2024

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 20, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-organized-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 20, 2024 10:21pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sws2apps-orgs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 20, 2024 10:21pm

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across multiple documentation files related to the Organized app. Key changes include the addition of a new FAQ section titled "Do you have other questions?" in various documents to enhance user support. Additionally, existing content has been refined for clarity, with specific sections expanded to provide more detailed information about app functionality, installation, security, and usage in congregations. Overall, the updates aim to improve user comprehension and engagement without altering the fundamental structure or functionality of the documents.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
organized/docs/app-overview/welcome-to-organized.md Language and phrasing adjustments for clarity; minor punctuation and formatting changes.
organized/docs/faq/features.md Added a new FAQ entry encouraging users to reach out for further assistance; minor text refinements.
organized/docs/faq/general.md Expanded descriptions of app functionality, installation instructions, uptime, and language support; improved clarity and formatting.
organized/docs/faq/relation-to-organization.md Added a new FAQ entry for user support; rephrased existing questions for clarity.
organized/docs/faq/security.md Introduced a new FAQ section; refined existing content on security features and data management.
organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md Updated phrasing for clarity; added a new FAQ section for user support.
organized/docs/troubleshooting/common-errors.md Added a new FAQ section encouraging user inquiries; retained essential information on JavaScript requirements.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update welcome-to-organized.md #403: This PR directly modifies the same file (welcome-to-organized.md) as the main PR, focusing on text refinement and structural changes that enhance clarity and organization.
  • Update general.md #404: This PR updates the general.md file, which is related to the FAQ section. It adds new content that clarifies the app's functionality, similar to the main PR's focus on enhancing clarity in documentation.
  • Update general.md #405: This PR also updates the general.md file, adding a section about the app's reliability and features during outages, which aligns with the main PR's goal of improving clarity and user understanding.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ux-git ux-git merged commit db8a8a2 into sws2apps:main Oct 20, 2024
10 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
organized/docs/faq/relation-to-organization.md (1)

31-33: Excellent addition to improve user support!

The new "Do you have other questions?" section is a valuable addition to the FAQ. It provides clear guidance for users who may not have found answers to their questions in the existing content. The reference to GitHub Discussions is particularly useful, as it offers a platform for users to seek further assistance.

Consider adding a brief sentence explaining what GitHub Discussions is, as some users might not be familiar with the platform. For example:

 If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!
+GitHub Discussions is a community forum where you can ask questions, share ideas, and interact with other users and the development team.
organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md (2)

47-49: Excellent addition of user support information.

The new "Do you have other questions?" section is a valuable addition that aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of enhancing user support and engagement. It provides a clear path for users to seek further assistance through GitHub Discussions.

This addition is consistent with similar updates across other documents, creating a unified approach to user support throughout the documentation.

Consider adding a blank line between the section title and the content for improved readability:

 ## Do you have other questions?
+
 If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!

45-45: Consider hyphenating "auto-sync" for clarity.

To improve clarity and adhere to common technical writing practices, consider adding a hyphen to "auto-sync":

-Yes, the app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be stored locally and not sent to any servers for total security. In this case, please remember that all your data is stored in your device's browser, so once you clear cookies or browser history, the data will be lost.
+Yes, the app can also be used in local mode when auto-sync turned off, meaning all data will be stored locally and not sent to any servers for total security. In this case, please remember that all your data is stored in your device's browser, so once you clear cookies or browser history, the data will be lost.

This small change enhances readability and consistency with typical technical terminology.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...

(AUTO_HYPHEN)

organized/docs/faq/features.md (1)

43-43: Fix typo in "notifications"

There's a minor typo in the word "notifications" in the previous section.

Please apply the following change:

-## Does Organized send timely notificaitons?
+## Does Organized send timely notifications?
organized/docs/faq/general.md (1)

72-72: Great addition to encourage user engagement!

This new section effectively guides users to seek further assistance if needed. It's user-friendly and aligns well with similar updates in other documents.

Consider adding a brief explanation of what GitHub Discussions are for users who might not be familiar with the platform. For example:

- If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!
+ If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions) (a forum-like platform where users can ask questions and share ideas), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!
organized/docs/faq/security.md (1)

104-106: LGTM: Helpful addition for user support

This new section effectively guides users to additional support channels, aligning with the PR objectives. It's consistent with similar updates in other documents and enhances user engagement.

Consider adding a brief explanation of what GitHub Discussions are, as some users might not be familiar with the platform. For example:

## Do you have other questions?

If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions) (a forum-like platform where you can ask questions and interact with the community), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1032ea7 and 5ca66b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • organized/docs/app-overview/welcome-to-organized.md (1 hunks)
  • organized/docs/faq/features.md (1 hunks)
  • organized/docs/faq/general.md (1 hunks)
  • organized/docs/faq/relation-to-organization.md (1 hunks)
  • organized/docs/faq/security.md (1 hunks)
  • organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md (1 hunks)
  • organized/docs/troubleshooting/common-errors.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
organized/docs/faq/features.md

[style] ~47-~47: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 9 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4922 characters long)
Context: ...o assist you. We’d love to hear from you!

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md

[uncategorized] ~43-~43: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...# Can I use the app without sending any data even in encrypted form to any servers? ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...

(AUTO_HYPHEN)

🔇 Additional comments (12)
organized/docs/troubleshooting/common-errors.md (2)

Line range hint 1-46: Overall assessment of changes

The addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section enhances the document by providing a clear path for users who need further assistance. This change:

  1. Improves user support by offering an additional resource (GitHub Discussions).
  2. Maintains consistency with other documentation files that have received similar updates.
  3. Does not disrupt the existing content or structure of the document.

The change aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation and improving user engagement.


43-46: Approve the new section with suggestions for improvement

The addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section is valuable for users who need further assistance. It's well-placed at the end of the document and encourages community engagement through GitHub Discussions.

To enhance its effectiveness, consider the following suggestions:

  1. Add a header to make the section more prominent, e.g., ## Do you have other questions?
  2. Use emphasis or bold text for key phrases to improve readability.

Here's a suggested revision:

## Do you have other questions?

If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but **still can't find the answer you're looking for**, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. **We'd love to hear from you!**

Please run the following script to verify the GitHub Discussions link:

✅ Verification successful

GitHub Discussions link verified and approved

The GitHub Discussions link in the "Do you have other questions?" section is valid. The proposed formatting enhancements effectively improve readability and user engagement.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the GitHub Discussions link

# Test: Check if the GitHub Discussions link is valid
response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions)
if [ $response -eq 200 ]; then
  echo "GitHub Discussions link is valid."
else
  echo "Error: GitHub Discussions link returned HTTP status code $response"
fi

Length of output: 209

organized/docs/faq/relation-to-organization.md (1)

Line range hint 1-33: Well-structured and informative document

The document maintains a clear and logical structure, effectively addressing various aspects of the Organized app's relationship with the Jehovah's Witnesses organization. The addition of the new "Do you have other questions?" section complements the existing content well, enhancing user support without disrupting the overall flow of information.

The content aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of clarifying aspects of the web application and improving user engagement. Great job on maintaining consistency and improving the documentation!

organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md (3)

37-37: Improved clarity in role examples.

The addition of "for example" before listing specific roles enhances the clarity of the recommendation. This change effectively communicates that the roles mentioned are not exhaustive, allowing for flexibility in who might initially use the app in a congregation.


43-45: Enhanced security emphasis and improved clarity.

The changes in these lines effectively highlight the security aspect of the app and improve overall readability:

  1. Adding "even in encrypted form" to the question emphasizes the high level of data privacy.
  2. The slight rewording in the explanation maintains the original meaning while enhancing clarity.

These modifications align well with the PR objectives of clarifying aspects of the web application.

Note: The static analysis tool suggested a possible missing comma in line 43, but this is a false positive. The sentence structure is correct for a question and doesn't require a comma.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~43-~43: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...# Can I use the app without sending any data even in encrypted form to any servers? ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...

(AUTO_HYPHEN)


Line range hint 1-49: Overall excellent improvements to the FAQ document.

The changes made to this document significantly enhance its clarity, readability, and user support. The modifications align well with the PR objectives, particularly in clarifying aspects of the web application and improving user engagement. The addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section is especially valuable for user support.

A few minor suggestions have been made for further improvements:

  1. Adding a blank line for better formatting in the new section.
  2. Hyphenating "auto-sync" for consistency with technical writing practices.

These small adjustments aside, the changes are approved and ready for merging.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~43-~43: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...# Can I use the app without sending any data even in encrypted form to any servers? ...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)


[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...

(AUTO_HYPHEN)

organized/docs/faq/features.md (1)

45-47: LGTM! New FAQ section added successfully.

The new "Do you have other questions?" section is a great addition to the FAQ. It encourages user engagement and provides a clear path for users to seek further assistance. This aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation and improving user support.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~47-~47: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 9 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4922 characters long)
Context: ...o assist you. We’d love to hear from you!

(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)

organized/docs/app-overview/welcome-to-organized.md (1)

57-57: Approved: Subtle improvement in user-centric language

The change from "straightforward and efficient" to "straightforward and easy" aligns well with the user-centric approach emphasized throughout the document. This subtle shift in wording focuses more on the user experience (ease of use) rather than just efficiency, which may be more appealing to a broader audience. The modification maintains the overall meaning while potentially making the app seem more approachable to new users.

organized/docs/faq/general.md (3)

65-67: Excellent summary of app reliability and user experience!

This conclusion effectively summarizes the app's reliability and the minimal impact of potential outages on user experience. It reassures users about data integrity and the app's offline capabilities, which is crucial for building trust in the application.


73-73: Approved: Good formatting practice

Adding an empty line at the end of the file is a good practice. It ensures that the last line of content is properly terminated and can prevent issues with some text editors or version control systems.


Line range hint 1-73: Overall excellent improvements to the FAQ

The changes made to this FAQ document significantly enhance its clarity, completeness, and user-friendliness. The expanded explanations, particularly regarding app reliability and offline functionality, provide valuable information to users. The addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section aligns well with the PR objectives and improvements seen in other documents.

These updates effectively address the goals of clarifying information about the web app and improving user support. Great job on these enhancements!

organized/docs/faq/security.md (1)

102-103: LGTM: Clear summary of access code vs. master key

This addition provides a concise and accurate summary of the differences between the access code and master key. It enhances the clarity of the security measures explanation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant