-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
new FAQs, web app clarification, link to discussions, formatting #407
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple documentation files related to the Organized app. Key changes include the addition of a new FAQ section titled "Do you have other questions?" in various documents to enhance user support. Additionally, existing content has been refined for clarity, with specific sections expanded to provide more detailed information about app functionality, installation, security, and usage in congregations. Overall, the updates aim to improve user comprehension and engagement without altering the fundamental structure or functionality of the documents. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
organized/docs/faq/relation-to-organization.md (1)
31-33: Excellent addition to improve user support!The new "Do you have other questions?" section is a valuable addition to the FAQ. It provides clear guidance for users who may not have found answers to their questions in the existing content. The reference to GitHub Discussions is particularly useful, as it offers a platform for users to seek further assistance.
Consider adding a brief sentence explaining what GitHub Discussions is, as some users might not be familiar with the platform. For example:
If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you! +GitHub Discussions is a community forum where you can ask questions, share ideas, and interact with other users and the development team.organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md (2)
47-49: Excellent addition of user support information.The new "Do you have other questions?" section is a valuable addition that aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of enhancing user support and engagement. It provides a clear path for users to seek further assistance through GitHub Discussions.
This addition is consistent with similar updates across other documents, creating a unified approach to user support throughout the documentation.
Consider adding a blank line between the section title and the content for improved readability:
## Do you have other questions? + If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!
45-45: Consider hyphenating "auto-sync" for clarity.To improve clarity and adhere to common technical writing practices, consider adding a hyphen to "auto-sync":
-Yes, the app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be stored locally and not sent to any servers for total security. In this case, please remember that all your data is stored in your device's browser, so once you clear cookies or browser history, the data will be lost. +Yes, the app can also be used in local mode when auto-sync turned off, meaning all data will be stored locally and not sent to any servers for total security. In this case, please remember that all your data is stored in your device's browser, so once you clear cookies or browser history, the data will be lost.This small change enhances readability and consistency with typical technical terminology.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...(AUTO_HYPHEN)
organized/docs/faq/features.md (1)
43-43: Fix typo in "notifications"There's a minor typo in the word "notifications" in the previous section.
Please apply the following change:
-## Does Organized send timely notificaitons? +## Does Organized send timely notifications?organized/docs/faq/general.md (1)
72-72: Great addition to encourage user engagement!This new section effectively guides users to seek further assistance if needed. It's user-friendly and aligns well with similar updates in other documents.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what GitHub Discussions are for users who might not be familiar with the platform. For example:
- If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you! + If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions) (a forum-like platform where users can ask questions and share ideas), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!organized/docs/faq/security.md (1)
104-106: LGTM: Helpful addition for user supportThis new section effectively guides users to additional support channels, aligning with the PR objectives. It's consistent with similar updates in other documents and enhances user engagement.
Consider adding a brief explanation of what GitHub Discussions are, as some users might not be familiar with the platform. For example:
## Do you have other questions? If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but still can't find the answer you're looking for, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions) (a forum-like platform where you can ask questions and interact with the community), and we'll do our best to assist you. We'd love to hear from you!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- organized/docs/app-overview/welcome-to-organized.md (1 hunks)
- organized/docs/faq/features.md (1 hunks)
- organized/docs/faq/general.md (1 hunks)
- organized/docs/faq/relation-to-organization.md (1 hunks)
- organized/docs/faq/security.md (1 hunks)
- organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md (1 hunks)
- organized/docs/troubleshooting/common-errors.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
organized/docs/faq/features.md
[style] ~47-~47: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 9 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4922 characters long)
Context: ...o assist you. We’d love to hear from you!(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md
[uncategorized] ~43-~43: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...# Can I use the app without sending any data even in encrypted form to any servers? ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...(AUTO_HYPHEN)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
organized/docs/troubleshooting/common-errors.md (2)
Line range hint
1-46: Overall assessment of changesThe addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section enhances the document by providing a clear path for users who need further assistance. This change:
- Improves user support by offering an additional resource (GitHub Discussions).
- Maintains consistency with other documentation files that have received similar updates.
- Does not disrupt the existing content or structure of the document.
The change aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation and improving user engagement.
43-46: Approve the new section with suggestions for improvementThe addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section is valuable for users who need further assistance. It's well-placed at the end of the document and encourages community engagement through GitHub Discussions.
To enhance its effectiveness, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a header to make the section more prominent, e.g.,
## Do you have other questions?- Use emphasis or bold text for key phrases to improve readability.
Here's a suggested revision:
## Do you have other questions? If you've gone through this user guide and our frequently asked questions but **still can't find the answer you're looking for**, don't hesitate to reach out! We're here to help. Just start a new [Discussion on our GitHub page](https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions), and we'll do our best to assist you. **We'd love to hear from you!**Please run the following script to verify the GitHub Discussions link:
✅ Verification successful
GitHub Discussions link verified and approved
The GitHub Discussions link in the "Do you have other questions?" section is valid. The proposed formatting enhancements effectively improve readability and user engagement.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the GitHub Discussions link # Test: Check if the GitHub Discussions link is valid response=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://github.com/sws2apps/organized-app/discussions) if [ $response -eq 200 ]; then echo "GitHub Discussions link is valid." else echo "Error: GitHub Discussions link returned HTTP status code $response" fiLength of output: 209
organized/docs/faq/relation-to-organization.md (1)
Line range hint
1-33: Well-structured and informative documentThe document maintains a clear and logical structure, effectively addressing various aspects of the Organized app's relationship with the Jehovah's Witnesses organization. The addition of the new "Do you have other questions?" section complements the existing content well, enhancing user support without disrupting the overall flow of information.
The content aligns perfectly with the PR objectives of clarifying aspects of the web application and improving user engagement. Great job on maintaining consistency and improving the documentation!
organized/docs/faq/use-in-congregation.md (3)
37-37: Improved clarity in role examples.The addition of "for example" before listing specific roles enhances the clarity of the recommendation. This change effectively communicates that the roles mentioned are not exhaustive, allowing for flexibility in who might initially use the app in a congregation.
43-45: Enhanced security emphasis and improved clarity.The changes in these lines effectively highlight the security aspect of the app and improve overall readability:
- Adding "even in encrypted form" to the question emphasizes the high level of data privacy.
- The slight rewording in the explanation maintains the original meaning while enhancing clarity.
These modifications align well with the PR objectives of clarifying aspects of the web application.
Note: The static analysis tool suggested a possible missing comma in line 43, but this is a false positive. The sentence structure is correct for a question and doesn't require a comma.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~43-~43: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...# Can I use the app without sending any data even in encrypted form to any servers? ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...(AUTO_HYPHEN)
Line range hint
1-49: Overall excellent improvements to the FAQ document.The changes made to this document significantly enhance its clarity, readability, and user support. The modifications align well with the PR objectives, particularly in clarifying aspects of the web application and improving user engagement. The addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section is especially valuable for user support.
A few minor suggestions have been made for further improvements:
- Adding a blank line for better formatting in the new section.
- Hyphenating "auto-sync" for consistency with technical writing practices.
These small adjustments aside, the changes are approved and ready for merging.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~43-~43: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...# Can I use the app without sending any data even in encrypted form to any servers? ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~45-~45: It appears that a hyphen is missing (if ‘auto’ is not used in the context of ‘cars’).
Context: ...app can also be used in local mode when auto sync turned off, meaning all data will be st...(AUTO_HYPHEN)
organized/docs/faq/features.md (1)
45-47: LGTM! New FAQ section added successfully.The new "Do you have other questions?" section is a great addition to the FAQ. It encourages user engagement and provides a clear path for users to seek further assistance. This aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation and improving user support.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~47-~47: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 9 exclamation marks for a text that’s 4922 characters long)
Context: ...o assist you. We’d love to hear from you!(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
organized/docs/app-overview/welcome-to-organized.md (1)
57-57: Approved: Subtle improvement in user-centric languageThe change from "straightforward and efficient" to "straightforward and easy" aligns well with the user-centric approach emphasized throughout the document. This subtle shift in wording focuses more on the user experience (ease of use) rather than just efficiency, which may be more appealing to a broader audience. The modification maintains the overall meaning while potentially making the app seem more approachable to new users.
organized/docs/faq/general.md (3)
65-67: Excellent summary of app reliability and user experience!This conclusion effectively summarizes the app's reliability and the minimal impact of potential outages on user experience. It reassures users about data integrity and the app's offline capabilities, which is crucial for building trust in the application.
73-73: Approved: Good formatting practiceAdding an empty line at the end of the file is a good practice. It ensures that the last line of content is properly terminated and can prevent issues with some text editors or version control systems.
Line range hint
1-73: Overall excellent improvements to the FAQThe changes made to this FAQ document significantly enhance its clarity, completeness, and user-friendliness. The expanded explanations, particularly regarding app reliability and offline functionality, provide valuable information to users. The addition of the "Do you have other questions?" section aligns well with the PR objectives and improvements seen in other documents.
These updates effectively address the goals of clarifying information about the web app and improving user support. Great job on these enhancements!
organized/docs/faq/security.md (1)
102-103: LGTM: Clear summary of access code vs. master keyThis addition provides a concise and accurate summary of the differences between the access code and master key. It enhances the clarity of the security measures explanation.



Description
Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.
Fixes # (issue)
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
Checklist: