Skip to content

Conversation

@mluedke
Copy link
Contributor

@mluedke mluedke commented Apr 17, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

@blacksd blacksd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to think this through a little bit more; what if we define multiple workload names w on multiple namespaces n - do we need to parse the n*m possibilities?
I think we need to stick to something that is able to address directly the kind of use we want to make for every annotation. Do I need to identify a name in a cloud provider? Those should be the only informations entered.

@Jujuyeh
Copy link
Collaborator

Jujuyeh commented May 9, 2024

This is an interesting discussion but it seems that customers are finding that their Components (or equivalent Entities) sometimes have complex mappings. For this purpose I added the sysdigcloud.com/custom-filter annotation; but it seems one will not be enough, as it overrides all annotations (for all sections).

So my takeaways are:

@Jujuyeh Jujuyeh closed this May 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants