-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
feat(platform): workflow human input approvals #821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6e114aa
feat(platform): add human input approvals to workflow engine and fix …
larryro 833ac05
feat(platform): split approval into executing/completed and fix human…
larryro 00f7593
feat(platform): batch workflow step updates, approval card refactor, …
larryro 5a8dfba
feat(platform): display system messages as collapsible chat items
larryro 7c9b97c
feat(platform): i18n approval cards, accessibility improvements, and …
larryro 7d05986
feat(platform): remove redundant idempotency guards and improve syste…
larryro 5f90fdf
chore: add rule to exclude Claude Code attribution from PRs
larryro 4983709
feat(platform): strip leading punctuation from approval questions and…
larryro 142a72b
fix(platform): resolve lint errors and update tests for atomic execut…
larryro File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Comment inaccuracy and missing trim when cursor not found.
Two issues:
The comment on line 386 says "asc-ordered results" but the default orderby is
receivedDateTime desc(line 314). The logic is correct, but the comment is misleading.When the cursor message is not found (line 401 fallback),
rawValuesretains up torequestedTop + 10messages from the over-fetch. Callers may receive more messages than requested, which could cause unexpected behavior.Proposed fix
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents