update intent workflow

[LadyBluenotes]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated skill coverage review workflow to generate comprehensive analysis reports including stale skills and additional review signals with detailed markdown content
  • Improved pull request management with intelligent branch reuse and automatic updates to existing pull request bodies
  • Enhanced error handling for review command failures

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

Pull request was closed or merged during review

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The workflow refactors its intent skill coverage review process: it now runs intent stale --json once, transforms JSON output into review-items.json with stale skills and signals, generates a detailed markdown PR body with grouped signal counts, and implements idempotent PR handling that reuses branches and edits existing PRs instead of always creating new ones.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)

Summary

Workflow Refactoring .github/workflows/check-skills.yml

Restructured intent skill coverage review logic: replaced single stale skills check with JSON transformation into review-items.json containing stale skills and additional signals; changed PR content generation from simple summary/prompt to full markdown pr-body.md with grouped signal counts and detailed agent prompt; implemented idempotent PR handling with branch reuse and existing PR body updates instead of always creating new PR/branch targeting main.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~45 minutes

Poem

🐰 Hops with glee through workflow new,
Intent stale skills turned shiny bright,
JSON blooms in review-items true,
PR branches dance, no duplicates in sight!
Idempotent magic, signals aligned—
Rabbit approves this code most refined! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title is vague and generic. It states 'update intent workflow' but does not convey the specific nature of the changes, such as the shift to intent skill coverage reviews, JSON transformation logic, or the idempotent PR handling flow.	Consider a more descriptive title that highlights the primary change, such as 'Refactor intent workflow for skill coverage reviews' or 'Update intent workflow to use skill coverage signals and idempotent PR handling'.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[nx-cloud]

View your CI Pipeline Execution ↗ for commit b4452c5

Command	Status	Duration	Result
nx affected --targets=test:eslint,test:unit,tes...	✅ Succeeded	<1s	View ↗
nx run-many --target=build --exclude=examples/*...	✅ Succeeded	2s	View ↗

---

☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2026-04-23 23:43:55 UTC